The State vs LAXMIBEN W/O NAVINBHAI JAGDISHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 111/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040001662026

Filing Number

111/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

111/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250484

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAXMIBEN W/O NAVINBHAI JAGDISHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 111/2026 Summary The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (liquor-related offense) after the accused voluntarily confessed. Considering the accused's clean criminal history, family circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 50 fine (instead of the statutory minimum), with 2 days simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered destruction of the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 111/2026 Summary The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (liquor-related offense) after the accused voluntarily confessed. Considering the accused's clean criminal history, family circumstances, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 50 fine (instead of the statutory minimum), with 2 days simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered destruction of the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case