The State vs MADHUBEN URFE VARSHABEN RAJUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 109/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040001642026

Case disposed

Filing Number

109/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

109/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250516

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

The State

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MADHUBEN URFE VARSHABEN RAJUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

26-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary of Case 109/2026 The accused was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 264 for an alleged offense and voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, clean criminal history, family circumstances, and principles established in precedent cases (particularly Natvar Harchand v. State), imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. The court convicted the accused and sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs. 50, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered destruction of confiscated contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 109/2026 The accused was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 264 for an alleged offense and voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, clean criminal history, family circumstances, and principles established in precedent cases (particularly Natvar Harchand v. State), imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. The court convicted the accused and sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs. 50, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered destruction of confiscated contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case