The State vs MADHUBEN URFE VARSHABEN RAJUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 109/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040001642026

Filing Number

109/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

109/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250516

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MADHUBEN URFE VARSHABEN RAJUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 109/2026 The accused was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 264 for an alleged offense and voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, clean criminal history, family circumstances, and principles established in precedent cases (particularly Natvar Harchand v. State), imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. The court convicted the accused and sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs. 50, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered destruction of confiscated contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 109/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 109/2026 The accused was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 264 for an alleged offense and voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, clean criminal history, family circumstances, and principles established in precedent cases (particularly Natvar Harchand v. State), imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. The court convicted the accused and sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs. 50, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered destruction of confiscated contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case