The State vs MADHUBEN URFE VARSHABEN RAJUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 109/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH040001642026
Filing Number
109/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
109/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, HANSOT
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199024250516
Police Station
HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MADHUBEN URFE VARSHABEN RAJUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 26-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 109/2026 The accused was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 264 for an alleged offense and voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, clean criminal history, family circumstances, and principles established in precedent cases (particularly Natvar Harchand v. State), imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. The court convicted the accused and sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs. 50, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered destruction of confiscated contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 109/2026 The accused was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 264 for an alleged offense and voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, clean criminal history, family circumstances, and principles established in precedent cases (particularly Natvar Harchand v. State), imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum. The court convicted the accused and sentenced them to pay a fine of Rs. 50, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered destruction of confiscated contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts