The State vs URMILABEN W/O HASMUKHBHAI RAMUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 107/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040001622026

Filing Number

107/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

107/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250514

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

1.The State

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.URMILABEN W/O HASMUKHBHAI RAMUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Case 107/2026 Summary The accused was charged under BNS Section 264 for an alcohol-related offense and voluntarily confessed guilt. The court, considering the accused's clean criminal history, voluntary confession, family circumstances, and economic situation, imposed a sentence lighter than the statutory minimum—a fine of ₹50 with two days simple imprisonment as alternative, and ordered destruction of the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
12-Mar-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
26-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
26-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 107/2026 Summary The accused was charged under BNS Section 264 for an alcohol-related offense and voluntarily confessed guilt. The court, considering the accused's clean criminal history, voluntary confession, family circumstances, and economic situation, imposed a sentence lighter than the statutory minimum—a fine of ₹50 with two days simple imprisonment as alternative, and ordered destruction of the seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.