The State vs SUMITRABEN W/O VIKRAMBHAI KALIDASBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 104/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH040001592026
Filing Number
104/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, HANSOT
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199024250572
Police Station
HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUMITRABEN W/O VIKRAMBHAI KALIDASBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 104/2026 The accused was charged under the Prohibition Act for an alcohol-related offense and voluntarily confessed to the crime. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, lack of prior criminal history, family and financial circumstances, and citing the principle established in *Natvarlal Harchand v. State*, imposed a sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The seized liquor was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2026
Case Summary: 104/2026 The accused was charged under the Prohibition Act for an alcohol-related offense and voluntarily confessed to the crime. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, lack of prior criminal history, family and financial circumstances, and citing the principle established in *Natvarlal Harchand v. State*, imposed a sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The seized liquor was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts