The State vs RADHABEN W/O JAGDISHBHAI MANGABHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 100/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH040001552026
Filing Number
100/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
100/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, HANSOT
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199024250508
Police Station
HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RADHABEN W/O JAGDISHBHAI MANGABHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the accused Radhaben under BNS Section 264 (alcohol-related offense) after she voluntarily admitted guilt. Considering her clean criminal history, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and voluntary confession, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 50 fine instead of the statutory minimum punishment, with 2 days simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. Additionally, seized contraband liquor was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 100/2026
The court convicted the accused Radhaben under BNS Section 264 (alcohol-related offense) after she voluntarily admitted guilt. Considering her clean criminal history, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and voluntary confession, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 50 fine instead of the statutory minimum punishment, with 2 days simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. Additionally, seized contraband liquor was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts