The State vs SUMANBEN W/O KANJIBHAI MOTIYABHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 95/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040001502026

Filing Number

95/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

95/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250610

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUMANBEN W/O KANJIBHAI MOTIYABHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused Sumanben under BNS Section 264 for the charged offense. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, absence of prior criminal history, economic circumstances, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 50 fine instead of the statutory minimum punishment, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. The court also ordered destruction of the seized contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Sumanben under BNS Section 264 for the charged offense. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, absence of prior criminal history, economic circumstances, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 50 fine instead of the statutory minimum punishment, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. The court also ordered destruction of the seized contraband liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case