The State vs MINABEN W/O RAJUBHAI BHANABHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 93/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH040001482026
Filing Number
93/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
93/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, HANSOT
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199024250485
Police Station
HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MINABEN W/O RAJUBHAI BHANABHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary of Case 93/2026 The State prosecuted respondent Minaben W/O Rajubhai Bhanabhai Vasava under the Prohibition Act. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and the court found no prior criminal history. Considering the accused's voluntary plea, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and relevant precedent law, the court convicted her under BNS Section 264 but imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as alternative, and confiscation of seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2026
Summary of Case 93/2026 The State prosecuted respondent Minaben W/O Rajubhai Bhanabhai Vasava under the Prohibition Act. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and the court found no prior criminal history. Considering the accused's voluntary plea, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and relevant precedent law, the court convicted her under BNS Section 264 but imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as alternative, and confiscation of seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts