The State vs MINABEN W/O RAJUBHAI BHANABHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 93/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH040001482026

Case disposed

Filing Number

93/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

93/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199024250485

Police Station

HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

The State

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MINABEN W/O RAJUBHAI BHANABHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

24-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary of Case 93/2026 The State prosecuted respondent Minaben W/O Rajubhai Bhanabhai Vasava under the Prohibition Act. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and the court found no prior criminal history. Considering the accused's voluntary plea, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and relevant precedent law, the court convicted her under BNS Section 264 but imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as alternative, and confiscation of seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 93/2026 The State prosecuted respondent Minaben W/O Rajubhai Bhanabhai Vasava under the Prohibition Act. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and the court found no prior criminal history. Considering the accused's voluntary plea, economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and relevant precedent law, the court convicted her under BNS Section 264 but imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of Rs. 50, with 2 days simple imprisonment as alternative, and confiscation of seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, HANSOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case