The State vs LILABEN W/O RAVJIBHAI SHIVABHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR — 91/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH040001462026
Filing Number
91/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
91/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, HANSOT
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199024250554
Police Station
HANSOT POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.LILABEN W/O RAVJIBHAI SHIVABHAI VASAVA Advocate - H N PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
In Case 91/2026, the court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (related to contraband/illicit liquor). The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense, had no prior criminal history, and faced difficult economic and family circumstances. Considering these mitigating factors and citing precedent, the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 50 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid) instead of the statutory minimum, and ordered destruction of seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2026
In Case 91/2026, the court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 264 (related to contraband/illicit liquor). The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense, had no prior criminal history, and faced difficult economic and family circumstances. Considering these mitigating factors and citing precedent, the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 50 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid) instead of the statutory minimum, and ordered destruction of seized liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts