THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MANJUBEN REVLABHAI MANGABHAI VASAVA — 5055/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030104372025
Filing Number
5055/2025
Filing Date
11-Dec-2025
Registration No
5055/2025
Registration Date
11-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199006250568
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR RURAL POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANJUBEN REVLABHAI MANGABHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 5055/2025 The court acquitted Manjuben Revlabhai Mangabhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the investigation. The court determined that the panch (witness) statements lacked credibility as the panchs were police officers rather than independent witnesses, and the seized liquid sample testing was not properly documented or verified through certified laboratory reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 5055/2025
Case Summary: 5055/2025 The court acquitted Manjuben Revlabhai Mangabhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the investigation. The court determined that the panch (witness) statements lacked credibility as the panchs were police officers rather than independent witnesses, and the seized liquid sample testing was not properly documented or verified through certified laboratory reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts