THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JAVERIBEN RAVIYABHAI DAHYABHAI VASAVA — 5039/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030104202025
Filing Number
5039/2025
Filing Date
11-Dec-2025
Registration No
5039/2025
Registration Date
11-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
111990061250533
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR RURAL POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAVERIBEN RAVIYABHAI DAHYABHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Javeriben Raviyabhai Dahyabhai Vasava (5039/2025) The court acquitted the respondent of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish credible panchnama (witness statement) as the panch members were police officers rather than independent witnesses, and the seized substance testing report was not properly presented in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 5039/2025
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Javeriben Raviyabhai Dahyabhai Vasava (5039/2025) The court acquitted the respondent of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish credible panchnama (witness statement) as the panch members were police officers rather than independent witnesses, and the seized substance testing report was not properly presented in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts