THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RITABEN VIJAYBHAI BHOLABHAI VASAVA — 4893/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030100912025
Filing Number
4893/2025
Filing Date
06-Dec-2025
Registration No
4893/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199061250783
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR CITY B DIVISION POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RITABEN VIJAYBHAI BHOLABHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Ritaben Vijaybhai Bholabhai Vasava (4893/2025) The court acquitted the respondent under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illegal sale of country liquor. The prosecution failed to establish a credible panchnama (seizure record), as the five witnesses were police officers rather than independent civilians, and could not substantiate the seizure details. The court found insufficient evidence to convict, noting the absence of proper testing laboratory reports and contradictions in the investigation record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4893/2025
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Ritaben Vijaybhai Bholabhai Vasava (4893/2025) The court acquitted the respondent under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illegal sale of country liquor. The prosecution failed to establish a credible panchnama (seizure record), as the five witnesses were police officers rather than independent civilians, and could not substantiate the seizure details. The court found insufficient evidence to convict, noting the absence of proper testing laboratory reports and contradictions in the investigation record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts