THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KALIBEN MANGABHAI DEVABHAI VASAVA — 4888/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030100862025
Filing Number
4888/2025
Filing Date
06-Dec-2025
Registration No
4888/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199061250762
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR CITY B DIVISION POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KALIBEN MANGABHAI DEVABHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 4888/2025 - State of Gujarat v. Kaliben Mangabhai Devabhai Vasava The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects. The prosecution failed to establish proper panchnama (witness statement) credibility, as the witnesses were all police officers rather than independent parties, and critical chemical testing reports were absent from the record, making the seized contraband's proof questionable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4888/2025
Case Summary: 4888/2025 - State of Gujarat v. Kaliben Mangabhai Devabhai Vasava The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects. The prosecution failed to establish proper panchnama (witness statement) credibility, as the witnesses were all police officers rather than independent parties, and critical chemical testing reports were absent from the record, making the seized contraband's proof questionable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts