THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VARSHABEN KANCHANBHAI RATILALBHAI VASAVA — 4775/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030098802025
Filing Number
4775/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
4775/2025
Registration Date
04-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199061250821
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR CITY B DIVISION POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VARSHABEN KANCHANBHAI RATILALBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
The Gujarat High Court acquitted Varshaben Kanchanbhai Ratilalbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence of the alleged offense of unauthorized liquor sales. The court held that the panchnama (official record) was not properly substantiated, the witnesses lacked credible knowledge, and the scientific testing of seized samples was not produced to establish the seized substance's nature, making it impossible to convict based on uncorroborated police testimony alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4775/2025
The Gujarat High Court acquitted Varshaben Kanchanbhai Ratilalbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence of the alleged offense of unauthorized liquor sales. The court held that the panchnama (official record) was not properly substantiated, the witnesses lacked credible knowledge, and the scientific testing of seized samples was not produced to establish the seized substance's nature, making it impossible to convict based on uncorroborated police testimony alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts