THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GITABEN RAMESHBHAI CHHITABHAI VASAVA — 4522/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030094642025
Filing Number
4522/2025
Filing Date
19-Nov-2025
Registration No
4522/2025
Registration Date
19-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021251013
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.GITABEN RAMESHBHAI CHHITABHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the accused Gitaben Rameshbhai Chhitabhai Vasava under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 264 and sentenced her to 2 years imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200 (or Rs. 50 additional imprisonment in default). The court found that while the accused came from a poor and middle-class background with family dependents, mitigating circumstances warranted lenient sentencing rather than the maximum penalty, considering her remorse and promise of future good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4522/2025
The court convicted the accused Gitaben Rameshbhai Chhitabhai Vasava under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 264 and sentenced her to 2 years imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200 (or Rs. 50 additional imprisonment in default). The court found that while the accused came from a poor and middle-class background with family dependents, mitigating circumstances warranted lenient sentencing rather than the maximum penalty, considering her remorse and promise of future good conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts