THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJAYKUMR @ GALAT SANGMESHBHAI DARBAR Advocate - S B PATEL — 4484/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,354(A),447,427,323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030094202024
Filing Number
4484/2024
Filing Date
17-Sep-2024
Registration No
4484/2024
Registration Date
17-Sep-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
4-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199061240471
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR CITY B DIVISION POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAYKUMR @ GALAT SANGMESHBHAI DARBAR Advocate - S B PATEL
-
2.SAGARKUMAR ASHOKBHAI PATHKAR
-
3.RAHULBHAI BHIKHABHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: CC No. 4484/2024 Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused—Rahulbhai Vasava, Sagarkumar Ashokbhai Pathkar, and Ajaykumar (alias Galat) Sangmeshkumar Darbar—of charges under IPC Section 271 and related sections (353, 354, 448, 427, 323, 504, 506(2), 114). Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case that the accused had assaulted and wrongfully confined the complainant. Despite serious allegations involving midnight home invasion, assault, and threats, the court determined the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration, witness accounts were inconsistent, and physical/documentary evidence failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 4484/2024
Case Summary: CC No. 4484/2024 Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused—Rahulbhai Vasava, Sagarkumar Ashokbhai Pathkar, and Ajaykumar (alias Galat) Sangmeshkumar Darbar—of charges under IPC Section 271 and related sections (353, 354, 448, 427, 323, 504, 506(2), 114). Key Reasoning: The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case that the accused had assaulted and wrongfully confined the complainant. Despite serious allegations involving midnight home invasion, assault, and threats, the court determined the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration, witness accounts were inconsistent, and physical/documentary evidence failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts