VISHALBHAI RAVJIBHAI PADARIYA PARTNER OF VISHALAKSHI PACKAGING vs MANPASAND BEVARJI CO.LTD — 69/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 13th May 2026.
COMM CS - COMMERCIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH030093912023
Filing Number
69/2023
Filing Date
12-Jun-2023
Registration No
69/2023
Registration Date
12-Jun-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHALBHAI RAVJIBHAI PADARIYA PARTNER OF VISHALAKSHI PACKAGING
Adv. P C RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANPASAND BEVARJI CO.LTD
-
2.ABHISHEKSING (DIRECTOR)
-
3.DHIRENDRA HANSRAJSING
-
4.HARSHVADANSING
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
The Commercial Court at Ankleshwar partly allowed the suit, ordering defendants to pay Rs. 47,31,851/- with 9% per annum interest from the suit's institution date till realization. The court found the plaintiff (corrugated box manufacturer) established the outstanding debt through purchase orders, tax invoices, and ledger accounts, though it rejected the claim regarding dishonored cheques due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Apr-2026
Order
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Apr-2026
Order
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Oct-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Sep-2025
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Sep-2025
Documentary Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Sep-2025
Documentary Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Aug-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Jul-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Jun-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Apr-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Feb-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Jan-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Nov-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Oct-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Aug-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Jun-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-May-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Apr-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
15-Mar-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Feb-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Jan-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Dec-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 69/2023
The Commercial Court at Ankleshwar partly allowed the suit, ordering defendants to pay Rs. 47,31,851/- with 9% per annum interest from the suit's institution date till realization. The court found the plaintiff (corrugated box manufacturer) established the outstanding debt through purchase orders, tax invoices, and ledger accounts, though it rejected the claim regarding dishonored cheques due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts