DEPUTY ENGINEERSHRI DAXIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED (RURAL SUB DIVISION) vs PATEL SHAMALBHAI AMBALAL — 132/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH030085372024

Filing Number

132/2024

Filing Date

27-Aug-2024

Registration No

132/2024

Registration Date

27-Aug-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY ENGINEERSHRI DAXIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED (RURAL SUB DIVISION)

    Adv. P P SOLANKI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL SHAMALBHAI AMBALAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: DGVCL v. Patel Shamalbhai Ambalal (Civil Suit 132/2024) The court partly allowed DGVCL's suit for recovery of Rs. 80,309.47 against the defendant for illegal electricity consumption. The court found the defendant was caught using electricity without authorization via an unauthorized 10-meter wire connection and ordered him to pay the full claimed amount plus 6% per annum interest from suit institution (not the claimed 18%), holding that no contractual basis existed for the higher rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 02-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 24-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 16-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 09-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 02-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 25-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 18-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 05-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 23-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 13-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 28-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 31-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 09-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 10-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 13-Oct-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 30-Aug-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 23-Jul-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 21-Jun-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 19-Apr-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 15-Mar-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 15-Feb-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 15-Jan-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 10-Dec-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 11-Nov-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 30-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 27-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 132/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: DGVCL v. Patel Shamalbhai Ambalal (Civil Suit 132/2024) The court partly allowed DGVCL's suit for recovery of Rs. 80,309.47 against the defendant for illegal electricity consumption. The court found the defendant was caught using electricity without authorization via an unauthorized 10-meter wire connection and ordered him to pay the full claimed amount plus 6% per annum interest from suit institution (not the claimed 18%), holding that no contractual basis existed for the higher rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case