KUNJAY RUPESHKUMAR MODI vs RAJAKHAN SANIFKHAN Advocate - A I PATHAN — 4743/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030085302022

Filing Number

4743/2022

Filing Date

18-Oct-2022

Registration No

4743/2022

Registration Date

18-Oct-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUNJAY RUPESHKUMAR MODI

    Adv. P J BESHANWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJAKHAN SANIFKHAN Advocate - A I PATHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 4743/2022 Court Decision: The court convicted the respondent advocate Rajakhan Sanifkhan under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque of ₹1,20,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found all statutory presumptions under Section 138 satisfied and rejected the respondent's defense. Key Reasoning: The petitioner had established that consideration and debt existed, the cheque was issued for a legitimate business transaction, proper notice was served after dishonor, and the respondent failed to rebut the statutory presumptions with credible evidence. The court sentenced the respondent to one year simple imprisonment and ordered payment of compensation within 60 days, with additional imprisonment for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 01-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 15-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 30-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 22-Aug-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 22-Jul-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 27-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 24-Dec-2024

    Plea

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  24. 13-Dec-2024

    Plea

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  25. 10-Dec-2024

    Plea

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  26. 05-Nov-2024

    Plea

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  27. 01-Oct-2024

    Plea

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  28. 27-Aug-2024

    Plea

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  29. 03-Jul-2024

    Plea

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  30. 14-May-2024

    Plea

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  31. 01-Apr-2024

    Plea

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  32. 26-Feb-2024

    Plea

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  33. 30-Jan-2024

    Plea

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  34. 20-Dec-2023

    Plea

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  35. 07-Nov-2023

    Plea

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  36. 03-Oct-2023

    Plea

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  37. 28-Aug-2023

    Plea

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  38. 17-Jul-2023

    Plea

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  39. 28-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  40. 22-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  41. 17-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

  42. 31-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

  43. 04-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

  44. 04-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  45. 29-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  46. 18-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 18-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4743/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 4743/2022 Court Decision: The court convicted the respondent advocate Rajakhan Sanifkhan under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque of ₹1,20,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court found all statutory presumptions under Section 138 satisfied and rejected the respondent's defense. Key Reasoning: The petitioner had established that consideration and debt existed, the cheque was issued for a legitimate business transaction, proper notice was served after dishonor, and the respondent failed to rebut the statutory presumptions with credible evidence. The court sentenced the respondent to one year simple imprisonment and ordered payment of compensation within 60 days, with additional imprisonment for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case