THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MADHUBEN SHIVPRASAD JUNARBI PATANVADIYA — 3980/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030083272025
Filing Number
3980/2025
Filing Date
04-Oct-2025
Registration No
3980/2025
Registration Date
04-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199004250691
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR CITY POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MADHUBEN SHIVPRASAD JUNARBI PATANVADIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted the respondent, Madhuben Shivprasad Junarbi Patanvadiya, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged offense of unauthorized liquor sale. The judgment emphasized that the prosecution failed to establish credible witness testimony and proper documentation required for conviction, and directed destruction of seized samples per legal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Apr-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3980/2025
The court acquitted the respondent, Madhuben Shivprasad Junarbi Patanvadiya, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged offense of unauthorized liquor sale. The judgment emphasized that the prosecution failed to establish credible witness testimony and proper documentation required for conviction, and directed destruction of seized samples per legal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts