THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MOHITKUMAR JITUBHAI VARMA — 3689/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030076472025
Filing Number
3689/2025
Filing Date
10-Sep-2025
Registration No
3689/2025
Registration Date
10-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021250768
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHITKUMAR JITUBHAI VARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted respondent Mohitkumar Jitubhai Varma of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Amendment) 2017, Section 65(A), finding insufficient credible evidence. The investigation panch witnesses were all police officers lacking independence, and critical evidence including laboratory testing reports for the seized contraband was not produced, rendering the prosecution's case fatally defective. The court held that without reliable corroborating evidence and proper procedural compliance, conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3689/2025
The court acquitted respondent Mohitkumar Jitubhai Varma of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Amendment) 2017, Section 65(A), finding insufficient credible evidence. The investigation panch witnesses were all police officers lacking independence, and critical evidence including laboratory testing reports for the seized contraband was not produced, rendering the prosecution's case fatally defective. The court held that without reliable corroborating evidence and proper procedural compliance, conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts