THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RASHMIKABEN RAJUBHAI BALUBHAI PARMAR — 3530/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030073732025
Filing Number
3530/2025
Filing Date
02-Sep-2025
Registration No
3530/2025
Registration Date
02-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021250576
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RASHMIKABEN RAJUBHAI BALUBHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 3530/2025 - The State of Gujarat v. Rashmikaben Rajubhai Balubhai Parmar The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence. The investigation relied on statements from police panchas (witnesses) whose credibility was questionable—they could not substantiate details of the alleged seized contraband, and the chemical testing report was not produced before the court. The court held that absent reliable corroborating evidence and proper documentary proof of the alleged offense, conviction could not be sustained, and thus acquitted the respondent under CrPC Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3530/2025
Case Summary: 3530/2025 - The State of Gujarat v. Rashmikaben Rajubhai Balubhai Parmar The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence. The investigation relied on statements from police panchas (witnesses) whose credibility was questionable—they could not substantiate details of the alleged seized contraband, and the chemical testing report was not produced before the court. The court held that absent reliable corroborating evidence and proper documentary proof of the alleged offense, conviction could not be sustained, and thus acquitted the respondent under CrPC Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts