THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AASHABEN RANJIT (URFE) VIJAY GHISASING VASAVA — 3529/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030073722025
Filing Number
3529/2025
Filing Date
02-Sep-2025
Registration No
3529/2025
Registration Date
02-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021250507
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AASHABEN RANJIT (URFE) VIJAY GHISASING VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted the respondent Aashaben Ranjit (Urfe) Vijay Ghisasing Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence that she intended to sell illicit liquor. The court determined that the panchanama (official record) prepared during the investigation lacked credibility due to the panch members being police officers rather than independent witnesses, and the seized samples' testing report was not produced, making the prosecution's case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Apr-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3529/2025
The court acquitted the respondent Aashaben Ranjit (Urfe) Vijay Ghisasing Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence that she intended to sell illicit liquor. The court determined that the panchanama (official record) prepared during the investigation lacked credibility due to the panch members being police officers rather than independent witnesses, and the seized samples' testing report was not produced, making the prosecution's case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts