SAHANI DHANSHYAM vs RAMESHNATH SHIVDHARI TIWARI Advocate - T D JOSHI — 4042/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030070382022

Filing Number

4042/2022

Filing Date

25-Aug-2022

Registration No

4042/2022

Registration Date

25-Aug-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHANI DHANSHYAM

    Adv. Y D PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHNATH SHIVDHARI TIWARI Advocate - T D JOSHI

  2. 2.PREM SHILA TIWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 4042/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused (defendants Rameshnarth Shivdhari Tiwari and Prem Shila Tiwari) of charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the complainant (Sahani Dhanshyam) issued two cheques as part of a construction contract, the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumptions by establishing credible circumstances. The accused demonstrated through their defense that the consideration and debt allegedly underlying the cheques were questionable, and certain procedural irregularities in issuing stop-payment notices undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Order

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Order

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 02-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 30-May-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 18-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 21-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 04-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 30-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 12-Jul-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 24-Jun-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 13-May-2024

    Further Statement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  34. 08-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  35. 26-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  36. 15-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  37. 04-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  38. 20-Oct-2023

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  39. 14-Oct-2023

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  40. 07-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  41. 16-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  42. 21-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  43. 04-Jul-2023

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  44. 15-May-2023

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  45. 10-Apr-2023

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  46. 03-Mar-2023

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  47. 28-Feb-2023

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  48. 17-Jan-2023

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  49. 19-Dec-2022

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  50. 15-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  51. 26-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 25-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4042/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 4042/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused (defendants Rameshnarth Shivdhari Tiwari and Prem Shila Tiwari) of charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the complainant (Sahani Dhanshyam) issued two cheques as part of a construction contract, the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumptions by establishing credible circumstances. The accused demonstrated through their defense that the consideration and debt allegedly underlying the cheques were questionable, and certain procedural irregularities in issuing stop-payment notices undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case