THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs YOGITABEN ASHISHBHAI MANUBHAI VASAVA — 3223/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030069022025
Filing Number
3223/2025
Filing Date
20-Aug-2025
Registration No
3223/2025
Registration Date
20-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021250649
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.YOGITABEN ASHISHBHAI MANUBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Yogitaben Ashishbhai Manubhai Vasava (3223/2025) The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a credible panchnama (witness record) as the panch members were police officers rather than independent witnesses, rendering the documentary evidence unreliable and inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3223/2025
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Yogitaben Ashishbhai Manubhai Vasava (3223/2025) The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a credible panchnama (witness record) as the panch members were police officers rather than independent witnesses, rendering the documentary evidence unreliable and inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts