THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs IMRAN (URFE) MARGHI DILAWARSHA DIWAN — 3210/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030068812025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3210/2025

Filing Date

20-08-2025

Registration No

3210/2025

Registration Date

20-08-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199004250452

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR CITY POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PREVENTION OF GAMBLING ACT, 1887 Section 12(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

IMRAN (URFE) MARGHI DILAWARSHA DIWAN

SHOKAT HUSHEN ABDUL RAJAK PATHAN

DIPAK MANSING SONI

IMRAN (URFE) SANATA ABDUL KADIR SHEIKH

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

13-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

08-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court accepted the accused's plea of guilt under IPC Section 12(A) for gambling-related offenses. The court convicted all three respondents and sentenced them to imprisonment of 15 days along with fines (₹200 each for one accused, ₹100 for another, with court fees added). The judgment considered the accused's financial and social circumstances as mitigating factors in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the accused's plea of guilt under IPC Section 12(A) for gambling-related offenses. The court convicted all three respondents and sentenced them to imprisonment of 15 days along with fines (₹200 each for one accused, ₹100 for another, with court fees added). The judgment considered the accused's financial and social circumstances as mitigating factors in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case