THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs IMRAN (URFE) MARGHI DILAWARSHA DIWAN — 3210/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030068812025
Filing Number
3210/2025
Filing Date
20-Aug-2025
Registration No
3210/2025
Registration Date
20-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199004250452
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR CITY POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.IMRAN (URFE) MARGHI DILAWARSHA DIWAN
-
2.SHOKAT HUSHEN ABDUL RAJAK PATHAN
-
3.DIPAK MANSING SONI
-
4.IMRAN (URFE) SANATA ABDUL KADIR SHEIKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court accepted the accused's plea of guilt under IPC Section 12(A) for gambling-related offenses. The court convicted all three respondents and sentenced them to imprisonment of 15 days along with fines (₹200 each for one accused, ₹100 for another, with court fees added). The judgment considered the accused's financial and social circumstances as mitigating factors in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3210/2025
The court accepted the accused's plea of guilt under IPC Section 12(A) for gambling-related offenses. The court convicted all three respondents and sentenced them to imprisonment of 15 days along with fines (₹200 each for one accused, ₹100 for another, with court fees added). The judgment considered the accused's financial and social circumstances as mitigating factors in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts