THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUMANBEN HARESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI VASAVA — 2979/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030064492025
Filing Number
2979/2025
Filing Date
31-Jul-2025
Registration No
2979/2025
Registration Date
31-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199006250199
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR RURAL POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUMANBEN HARESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
The Gujarat High Court acquitted respondent Sumanben Hareshbhai Chandubhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA), finding insufficient evidence and credibility issues with the panchanama (seizure report). The court ruled that the investigating officer failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the five witnesses to the seizure were all police officers lacking independence, and the chemical testing report was not produced as corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2979/2025
The Gujarat High Court acquitted respondent Sumanben Hareshbhai Chandubhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA), finding insufficient evidence and credibility issues with the panchanama (seizure report). The court ruled that the investigating officer failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the five witnesses to the seizure were all police officers lacking independence, and the chemical testing report was not produced as corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts