THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SAROJBEN ASHWINBHAI AMBUBHAI VASAVA — 2900/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030063182025
Filing Number
2900/2025
Filing Date
29-Jul-2025
Registration No
2900/2025
Registration Date
29-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199061250304
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR CITY B DIVISION POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAROJBEN ASHWINBHAI AMBUBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted respondent Sarojben Ashwinbhai Ambubhai Vasava of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish proper panchnama (formal record) with credible witnesses, as the panch members were police officers rather than independent citizens, and no certified testing laboratory report confirmed the seized substance. The acquittal was ordered under CrPC Section 271(1) for lack of reliable corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2900/2025
The court acquitted respondent Sarojben Ashwinbhai Ambubhai Vasava of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish proper panchnama (formal record) with credible witnesses, as the panch members were police officers rather than independent citizens, and no certified testing laboratory report confirmed the seized substance. The acquittal was ordered under CrPC Section 271(1) for lack of reliable corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts