THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SAJNIBEN RAMESHBHAI MANGABHAI VASAVA — 2865/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030062552025
Filing Number
2865/2025
Filing Date
25-Jul-2025
Registration No
2865/2025
Registration Date
25-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199060250256
Police Station
PANOLI POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAJNIBEN RAMESHBHAI MANGABHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Judegement
The court acquitted the respondent Sajniben Rameshbhai Mangabhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing and selling country liquor without a permit. The court found the state's case lacking sufficient credible evidence, noting that the panch (witness) statements were unreliable, the seizure procedure was questionable, and police witnesses lacked independent corroboration of the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2865/2025
The court acquitted the respondent Sajniben Rameshbhai Mangabhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing and selling country liquor without a permit. The court found the state's case lacking sufficient credible evidence, noting that the panch (witness) statements were unreliable, the seizure procedure was questionable, and police witnesses lacked independent corroboration of the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts