THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAMILABEN BABUBHAI DEVAJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S B PATEL — 2798/2022

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030048492022

Case disposed

Filing Number

2798/2022

Filing Date

08-06-2022

Registration No

2798/2022

Registration Date

08-06-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

4-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199004220884

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR CITY POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PREVENTION OF GAMBLING ACT, 1887 Section 12(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAMILABEN BABUBHAI DEVAJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S B PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 4-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

15-05-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

30-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

16-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

16-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

15-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary: Case 2798/2022 The State of Gujarat prosecuted respondent Ramilaben Babubhai Devajibhai Vasava under the Gambling Act for alleged illegal betting activities. The court acquitted the accused under CrPC Section 255(1), finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence. The prosecution's case relied heavily on police witness testimonies, but critical inconsistencies in their accounts regarding the recovery of betting slips, currency notes, and the identity of persons involved undermined the reliability of the evidence. The court held that mere police statements without corroborating documentary or physical evidence were insufficient to convict the accused of gambling offenses, particularly when the accused's defense counsel effectively challenged the prosecution's narrative during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 2798/2022 The State of Gujarat prosecuted respondent Ramilaben Babubhai Devajibhai Vasava under the Gambling Act for alleged illegal betting activities. The court acquitted the accused under CrPC Section 255(1), finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence. The prosecution's case relied heavily on police witness testimonies, but critical inconsistencies in their accounts regarding the recovery of betting slips, currency notes, and the identity of persons involved undermined the reliability of the evidence. The court held that mere police statements without corroborating documentary or physical evidence were insufficient to convict the accused of gambling offenses, particularly when the accused's defense counsel effectively challenged the prosecution's narrative during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case