THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAMILABEN BABUBHAI DEVAJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S B PATEL — 2798/2022
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030048492022
Filing Number
2798/2022
Filing Date
08-06-2022
Registration No
2798/2022
Registration Date
08-06-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
4-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199004220884
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR CITY POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAMILABEN BABUBHAI DEVAJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S B PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 30-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 2798/2022 The State of Gujarat prosecuted respondent Ramilaben Babubhai Devajibhai Vasava under the Gambling Act for alleged illegal betting activities. The court acquitted the accused under CrPC Section 255(1), finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence. The prosecution's case relied heavily on police witness testimonies, but critical inconsistencies in their accounts regarding the recovery of betting slips, currency notes, and the identity of persons involved undermined the reliability of the evidence. The court held that mere police statements without corroborating documentary or physical evidence were insufficient to convict the accused of gambling offenses, particularly when the accused's defense counsel effectively challenged the prosecution's narrative during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 2798/2022 The State of Gujarat prosecuted respondent Ramilaben Babubhai Devajibhai Vasava under the Gambling Act for alleged illegal betting activities. The court acquitted the accused under CrPC Section 255(1), finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence. The prosecution's case relied heavily on police witness testimonies, but critical inconsistencies in their accounts regarding the recovery of betting slips, currency notes, and the identity of persons involved undermined the reliability of the evidence. The court held that mere police statements without corroborating documentary or physical evidence were insufficient to convict the accused of gambling offenses, particularly when the accused's defense counsel effectively challenged the prosecution's narrative during cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts