MIRABEN RAMESHBHAI VASAVA vs HAKUBEN RAYJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - M R BHAGAT — 51/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: For R&p. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH030029022023
Filing Number
51/2023
Filing Date
05-Apr-2023
Registration No
51/2023
Registration Date
05-Apr-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MIRABEN RAMESHBHAI VASAVA
Adv. P R PARMAR
-
2.RANGILAL RAMESHBHAI VASAVA
Adv. P R PARMAR
-
3.RATANBEN RAMESHBHAI VASAVA
-
4.MAHESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI VASAVA
-
5.LAKSHMIBEN RAMESHBHAI VASAVA
-
6.SURESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI VASAVA
-
7.SANESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI VASAVA
-
8.GITABEN RAMESHBHAI VASAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HAKUBEN RAYJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - M R BHAGAT
Case History
-
16-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-May-2026
For R&P
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Jun-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Mar-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-Feb-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Jan-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Jan-2024
OrderView PDF
Case 51/2023 Summary The petitioners (Miraben, Rangilal, and Ratanben Rameshbhai Vasava) challenged the respondent's unauthorized construction on open land (352.25 sq ft) in property No. 740. The court found the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case—lacking documentary evidence of ownership and proof that the respondent's construction caused demonstrable financial loss. The court also determined that equitable balance of convenience favored the respondent. The petition was dismissed on January 2, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jan-2024
Issues
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Dec-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Oct-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Oct-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Sep-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Sep-2023
For Counter Affidavit
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Aug-2023
For Counter Affidavit
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Aug-2023
For Counter Affidavit
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Jul-2023
Written Statement
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Jun-2023
Written Statement
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Jun-2023
Written Statement
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Apr-2023
Written Statement
-
19-Apr-2023
Written Statement
-
13-Apr-2023
Written Statement
-
11-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 51/2023
Case 51/2023 Summary The petitioners (Miraben, Rangilal, and Ratanben Rameshbhai Vasava) challenged the respondent's unauthorized construction on open land (352.25 sq ft) in property No. 740. The court found the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case—lacking documentary evidence of ownership and proof that the respondent's construction caused demonstrable financial loss. The court also determined that equitable balance of convenience favored the respondent. The petition was dismissed on January 2, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts