VIHAR RAVINDRABHAI SHAH AUTHORISED OFFICER OF (HDFC BANK LIMITED) vs SINGH SANJEET MAHANT (BORROWER) — 300/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBH030021122026
Filing Number
300/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
300/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIHAR RAVINDRABHAI SHAH AUTHORISED OFFICER OF (HDFC BANK LIMITED)
Adv. A T VARDHANI
Respondent(s)
SINGH SANJEET MAHANT (BORROWER)
SINGH DURGAVATIDEVI SANJIT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 16-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA No. 300/2026 The court allowed HDFC Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged row house property in Ankleshwar from defaulting borrowers Singh Sanjeet Mahant and Mrs. Singh Durgavatidevi Sanjit. After verifying that the bank satisfied all statutory requirements—including issuance of statutory notice under Section 13(2), consideration of borrower objections, and submission of authorized officer's affidavit—the court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset and forward it to the bank within 90 days, with police assistance as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA No. 300/2026 The court allowed HDFC Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged row house property in Ankleshwar from defaulting borrowers Singh Sanjeet Mahant and Mrs. Singh Durgavatidevi Sanjit. After verifying that the bank satisfied all statutory requirements—including issuance of statutory notice under Section 13(2), consideration of borrower objections, and submission of authorized officer's affidavit—the court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset and forward it to the bank within 90 days, with police assistance as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts