PRAGNESH PATNI AUTHORISED OFFICER OF OMKARA ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PRAVATE LIMITED vs PRAVINSINH CHAUHAN (BORROWER) — 290/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBH030020662026

Case disposed

Filing Number

290/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

290/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

PRAGNESH PATNI AUTHORISED OFFICER OF OMKARA ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PRAVATE LIMITED

Adv. M M BHATT

Respondent(s)

PRAVINSINH CHAUHAN (BORROWER)

DHARMISHTHABEN PRAVINBHAI CHAUHAN (CO- BORROWER)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

08-05-2026

Disposed

05-05-2026

ORDER

18-04-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

30-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

Final Orders / Judgements

08-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CRMA 290/2026 Court Decision: The Ankleshwar court allowed Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, authorizing it to take possession of mortgaged commercial property (two basement shops in OM Tower, Ankleshwar) from defaulting borrowers Pravinsinh Chauhan and Dharmishthaben Chauhan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute possession and forward the asset to the secured creditor. Key Reasoning: The court found that Omkara satisfied all statutory requirements under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, including valid security interest, proper demand notice under Section 13(2), and an authorized officer's affidavit. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court held it must assist the secured creditor in taking possession without adjudicating the legality or propriety of the creditor's actions—such challenges are reserved for Section 17 proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA 290/2026 Court Decision: The Ankleshwar court allowed Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, authorizing it to take possession of mortgaged commercial property (two basement shops in OM Tower, Ankleshwar) from defaulting borrowers Pravinsinh Chauhan and Dharmishthaben Chauhan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute possession and forward the asset to the secured creditor. Key Reasoning: The court found that Omkara satisfied all statutory requirements under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, including valid security interest, proper demand notice under Section 13(2), and an authorized officer's affidavit. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court held it must assist the secured creditor in taking possession without adjudicating the legality or propriety of the creditor's actions—such challenges are reserved for Section 17 proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case