PRAGNESH PATNI AUTHORISED OFFICER OF OMKARA ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PRAVATE LIMITED vs PRAVINSINH CHAUHAN (BORROWER) — 290/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBH030020662026
Filing Number
290/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
290/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAGNESH PATNI AUTHORISED OFFICER OF OMKARA ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PRAVATE LIMITED
Adv. M M BHATT
Respondent(s)
PRAVINSINH CHAUHAN (BORROWER)
DHARMISHTHABEN PRAVINBHAI CHAUHAN (CO- BORROWER)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | ORDER |
| 18-04-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 30-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA 290/2026 Court Decision: The Ankleshwar court allowed Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, authorizing it to take possession of mortgaged commercial property (two basement shops in OM Tower, Ankleshwar) from defaulting borrowers Pravinsinh Chauhan and Dharmishthaben Chauhan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute possession and forward the asset to the secured creditor. Key Reasoning: The court found that Omkara satisfied all statutory requirements under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, including valid security interest, proper demand notice under Section 13(2), and an authorized officer's affidavit. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court held it must assist the secured creditor in taking possession without adjudicating the legality or propriety of the creditor's actions—such challenges are reserved for Section 17 proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA 290/2026 Court Decision: The Ankleshwar court allowed Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, authorizing it to take possession of mortgaged commercial property (two basement shops in OM Tower, Ankleshwar) from defaulting borrowers Pravinsinh Chauhan and Dharmishthaben Chauhan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute possession and forward the asset to the secured creditor. Key Reasoning: The court found that Omkara satisfied all statutory requirements under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, including valid security interest, proper demand notice under Section 13(2), and an authorized officer's affidavit. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court held it must assist the secured creditor in taking possession without adjudicating the legality or propriety of the creditor's actions—such challenges are reserved for Section 17 proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts