RAJENDRAKUMAR MEENA AUTHORISED OFFICER OF INDIAN BANK (ANKLESHWAR BRANCH) vs KAUSHIK BANSHILAL SOLANKI (BORROWER/ MORTGAGOR) — 246/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBH030018212026
Filing Number
246/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
246/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRAKUMAR MEENA AUTHORISED OFFICER OF INDIAN BANK (ANKLESHWAR BRANCH)
Adv. P A PANDYA
Respondent(s)
KAUSHIK BANSHILAL SOLANKI (BORROWER/ MORTGAGOR)
JYOTSANABEN SOLANKI (CO- BORROWER/ MORTGAGOR)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA No. 246/2026 Court Decision: The Ankleshwar Additional Senior Civil Judge allowed Indian Bank's SARFAESI Act application and appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property—a residential flat in Krishna Apartment, Gadkhol—from defaulting borrowers Kaushik Banshilal Solanki and Jyotsanaben Solanki. Key Reasoning: The court found the bank had satisfied all Section 14 requirements of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, including serving statutory notices and publishing newspaper advertisements. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court determined it need only verify factual compliance with procedural prerequisites, not adjudicate the underlying transaction's legality. The secured asset falls within the court's jurisdiction, and the borrowers defaulted despite demand notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CRMA No. 246/2026 Court Decision: The Ankleshwar Additional Senior Civil Judge allowed Indian Bank's SARFAESI Act application and appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property—a residential flat in Krishna Apartment, Gadkhol—from defaulting borrowers Kaushik Banshilal Solanki and Jyotsanaben Solanki. Key Reasoning: The court found the bank had satisfied all Section 14 requirements of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, including serving statutory notices and publishing newspaper advertisements. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court determined it need only verify factual compliance with procedural prerequisites, not adjudicate the underlying transaction's legality. The secured asset falls within the court's jurisdiction, and the borrowers defaulted despite demand notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts