RAJENDRAKUMAR MEENA AUTHORISED OFFICER OF INDIAN BANK (ANKLESHWAR BRANCH) vs KAUSHIK BANSHILAL SOLANKI (BORROWER/ MORTGAGOR) — 246/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBH030018212026

Filing Number

246/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

246/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRAKUMAR MEENA AUTHORISED OFFICER OF INDIAN BANK (ANKLESHWAR BRANCH)

    Adv. P A PANDYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAUSHIK BANSHILAL SOLANKI (BORROWER/ MORTGAGOR)

  2. 2.JYOTSANABEN SOLANKI (CO- BORROWER/ MORTGAGOR)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMA No. 246/2026 Court Decision: The Ankleshwar Additional Senior Civil Judge allowed Indian Bank's SARFAESI Act application and appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property—a residential flat in Krishna Apartment, Gadkhol—from defaulting borrowers Kaushik Banshilal Solanki and Jyotsanaben Solanki. Key Reasoning: The court found the bank had satisfied all Section 14 requirements of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, including serving statutory notices and publishing newspaper advertisements. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court determined it need only verify factual compliance with procedural prerequisites, not adjudicate the underlying transaction's legality. The secured asset falls within the court's jurisdiction, and the borrowers defaulted despite demand notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Process To Opponent

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 246/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA No. 246/2026 Court Decision: The Ankleshwar Additional Senior Civil Judge allowed Indian Bank's SARFAESI Act application and appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property—a residential flat in Krishna Apartment, Gadkhol—from defaulting borrowers Kaushik Banshilal Solanki and Jyotsanaben Solanki. Key Reasoning: The court found the bank had satisfied all Section 14 requirements of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, including serving statutory notices and publishing newspaper advertisements. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court determined it need only verify factual compliance with procedural prerequisites, not adjudicate the underlying transaction's legality. The secured asset falls within the court's jurisdiction, and the borrowers defaulted despite demand notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case