DEVENDRAKUMAR VARMA AUTHORISED OFFICER OF MUTHOOT HOUSING FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED (MHFCL) vs KISHOR SOMINATH DUDHE — 207/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 20th May 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBH030016202026
Filing Number
207/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
207/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEVENDRAKUMAR VARMA AUTHORISED OFFICER OF MUTHOOT HOUSING FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED (MHFCL)
Adv. S A GHEVARIYA
Respondent(s)
KISHOR SOMINATH DUDHE
SOMINATH GANDADU DUDHE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-05-2026 | ORDER |
| 05-05-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 18-04-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
| 04-04-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Muthoot Housing Finance Company's SARFAESI Act Section 14 application seeking possession of a mortgaged residential plot in Royal Park Residency, Bharuch. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset and forward it to the applicant after verifying the applicant satisfied all statutory requirements including valid security interest, borrower default, and compliance with 60-day notice provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed Muthoot Housing Finance Company's SARFAESI Act Section 14 application seeking possession of a mortgaged residential plot in Royal Park Residency, Bharuch. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset and forward it to the applicant after verifying the applicant satisfied all statutory requirements including valid security interest, borrower default, and compliance with 60-day notice provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts