PRAMOD S. PATIL AUTHORISED OFFICER OF DCB BANK LIMITED vs RAVIBHAI MULJIBHAI VANAKAR — 205/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBH030015732026

Case disposed

Filing Number

205/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

205/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

PRAMOD S. PATIL AUTHORISED OFFICER OF DCB BANK LIMITED

Adv. M M SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

RAVIBHAI MULJIBHAI VANAKAR

DAHIBEN MULJIBHAI VANKAR

MURAJIBHAI CHHITABHAI VANAKAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

ORDER

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

27-02-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court allowed DCB Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property (Plot No. 297, Green City, Jitali, Ankleshwar) from the borrowers who had defaulted on their loan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset after verifying that the bank satisfied all statutory requirements including proper notice under Section 13(2), valid mortgage, and NPA classification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

05-03-2026
ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed DCB Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property (Plot No. 297, Green City, Jitali, Ankleshwar) from the borrowers who had defaulted on their loan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset after verifying that the bank satisfied all statutory requirements including proper notice under Section 13(2), valid mortgage, and NPA classification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case