PRAMOD S. PATIL AUTHORISED OFFICER OF DCB BANK LIMITED vs RAVIBHAI MULJIBHAI VANAKAR — 205/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBH030015732026
Filing Number
205/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
205/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAMOD S. PATIL AUTHORISED OFFICER OF DCB BANK LIMITED
Adv. M M SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAVIBHAI MULJIBHAI VANAKAR
-
2.DAHIBEN MULJIBHAI VANKAR
-
3.MURAJIBHAI CHHITABHAI VANAKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court allowed DCB Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property (Plot No. 297, Green City, Jitali, Ankleshwar) from the borrowers who had defaulted on their loan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset after verifying that the bank satisfied all statutory requirements including proper notice under Section 13(2), valid mortgage, and NPA classification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Process To Opponent
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 205/2026
The court allowed DCB Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property (Plot No. 297, Green City, Jitali, Ankleshwar) from the borrowers who had defaulted on their loan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset after verifying that the bank satisfied all statutory requirements including proper notice under Section 13(2), valid mortgage, and NPA classification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts