THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JYOTIBEN RAJUBHAI NAGINBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S.A.VAKANI — 860/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030014812024
Filing Number
860/2024
Filing Date
05-02-2024
Registration No
860/2024
Registration Date
05-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
0992
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR CITY POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JYOTIBEN RAJUBHAI NAGINBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S.A.VAKANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
PLEA
PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 01-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 19-02-2026 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 860/2024 Decision: The Gujarat court acquitted accused Jyotiben Rajubhai Naginbhai Vasava of charges under the Gambling Act after finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a credible case, as witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked corroboration, while the seized evidence (betting slips, currency notes, and other materials) could not conclusively prove the accused's involvement in illegal gambling activities. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the prosecution's case relied heavily on police statements without independent verification. The five witnesses examined by the prosecution provided inconsistent accounts about the accused's direct participation in the alleged betting operation, and the accused's denial of involvement could not be disproven beyond reasonable doubt based on available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 860/2024 Decision: The Gujarat court acquitted accused Jyotiben Rajubhai Naginbhai Vasava of charges under the Gambling Act after finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a credible case, as witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked corroboration, while the seized evidence (betting slips, currency notes, and other materials) could not conclusively prove the accused's involvement in illegal gambling activities. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the prosecution's case relied heavily on police statements without independent verification. The five witnesses examined by the prosecution provided inconsistent accounts about the accused's direct participation in the alleged betting operation, and the accused's denial of involvement could not be disproven beyond reasonable doubt based on available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts