THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JYOTIBEN RAJUBHAI NAGINBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S.A.VAKANI — 860/2024

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030014812024

Case disposed

Filing Number

860/2024

Filing Date

05-02-2024

Registration No

860/2024

Registration Date

05-02-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

0992

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR CITY POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PREVENTION OF GAMBLING ACT, 1887 Section 12(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JYOTIBEN RAJUBHAI NAGINBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S.A.VAKANI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

07-05-2026

Disposed

20-04-2026

ORDER

01-04-2026

ORDER

16-03-2026

PLEA

19-02-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CC 860/2024 Decision: The Gujarat court acquitted accused Jyotiben Rajubhai Naginbhai Vasava of charges under the Gambling Act after finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a credible case, as witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked corroboration, while the seized evidence (betting slips, currency notes, and other materials) could not conclusively prove the accused's involvement in illegal gambling activities. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the prosecution's case relied heavily on police statements without independent verification. The five witnesses examined by the prosecution provided inconsistent accounts about the accused's direct participation in the alleged betting operation, and the accused's denial of involvement could not be disproven beyond reasonable doubt based on available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 860/2024 Decision: The Gujarat court acquitted accused Jyotiben Rajubhai Naginbhai Vasava of charges under the Gambling Act after finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a credible case, as witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked corroboration, while the seized evidence (betting slips, currency notes, and other materials) could not conclusively prove the accused's involvement in illegal gambling activities. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the prosecution's case relied heavily on police statements without independent verification. The five witnesses examined by the prosecution provided inconsistent accounts about the accused's direct participation in the alleged betting operation, and the accused's denial of involvement could not be disproven beyond reasonable doubt based on available evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case