THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KAVITADEVI KISHOR CHITARANJAN MANDAL — 721/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030010862026

Filing Number

721/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

721/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199021251562

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAVITADEVI KISHOR CHITARANJAN MANDAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kavitadevi Kishor Chitaranjan Mandal (721/2026) The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish proper panchnama (witness documentation) records and could not adequately prove the alleged contraband seizure, as the panch witnesses were primarily police officers rather than independent civilians, undermining the credibility of the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 721/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kavitadevi Kishor Chitaranjan Mandal (721/2026) The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish proper panchnama (witness documentation) records and could not adequately prove the alleged contraband seizure, as the panch witnesses were primarily police officers rather than independent civilians, undermining the credibility of the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case