THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KUNTIDEVI BHAGIRATH PARMESHWAR PRAJAPATI — 718/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030010832026
Filing Number
718/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
718/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021251553
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KUNTIDEVI BHAGIRATH PARMESHWAR PRAJAPATI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted the respondent (Kuntidevi) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a) for alleged illegal liquor sales, finding insufficient evidence and procedural deficiencies in the investigation. The panch (witness) statements lacked credibility as they couldn't substantiate details of the alleged offense, and the chemical testing report's authenticity was questionable, leading the court to conclude that guilt was not established beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-May-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 718/2026
The court acquitted the respondent (Kuntidevi) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a) for alleged illegal liquor sales, finding insufficient evidence and procedural deficiencies in the investigation. The panch (witness) statements lacked credibility as they couldn't substantiate details of the alleged offense, and the chemical testing report's authenticity was questionable, leading the court to conclude that guilt was not established beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts