THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LILABEN BALUBHAI HIMMATBHAI VASAVA — 713/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030010782026

Filing Number

713/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

713/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199021251537

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LILABEN BALUBHAI HIMMATBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted Lilaben Balubhai Himmatbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a) for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the investigation. The court noted that the panchnama (witness statement) lacked credibility, the police witnesses were biased, and the chemical testing report for the seized liquid was not produced, rendering key prosecution evidence unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 713/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted Lilaben Balubhai Himmatbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a) for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the investigation. The court noted that the panchnama (witness statement) lacked credibility, the police witnesses were biased, and the chemical testing report for the seized liquid was not produced, rendering key prosecution evidence unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case