THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KAMLABEN PUNIYABHAI KANIYABHAI VASAVA — 631/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030009662026

Filing Number

631/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

631/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199021251500

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMLABEN PUNIYABHAI KANIYABHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted the respondent Kamlaben Puniyabhai Kaniyabhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) due to insufficient and unreliable evidence. The judge found critical flaws in the investigation, including that the panch witnesses were police officers rather than independent citizens, the chemical testing report was not properly submitted, and the seizure panchnama lacked credibility, making it impossible to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 01-May-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 631/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the respondent Kamlaben Puniyabhai Kaniyabhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) due to insufficient and unreliable evidence. The judge found critical flaws in the investigation, including that the panch witnesses were police officers rather than independent citizens, the chemical testing report was not properly submitted, and the seizure panchnama lacked credibility, making it impossible to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case