THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DAKSHABEN SUKLAL FATESINGBHAI VASAVA — 629/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030009642026
Filing Number
629/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
629/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021251469
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DAKSHABEN SUKLAL FATESINGBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted respondent Dakshaben Suklal Fatesingbhai Vasava under IPC Section 264 and sentenced her to imprisonment for 2 days and a fine of ₹200 (or 2 days additional imprisonment in default). The court found that while the accused committed the offense, her circumstances—being a poor, middle-class woman with dependents and expressing remorse—warranted lenient punishment rather than maximum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 629/2026
The court convicted respondent Dakshaben Suklal Fatesingbhai Vasava under IPC Section 264 and sentenced her to imprisonment for 2 days and a fine of ₹200 (or 2 days additional imprisonment in default). The court found that while the accused committed the offense, her circumstances—being a poor, middle-class woman with dependents and expressing remorse—warranted lenient punishment rather than maximum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts