THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHARDABEN RAKESHBHAI RAMANBHAI VASAVA — 626/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030009602026
Filing Number
626/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
626/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021251460
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHARDABEN RAKESHBHAI RAMANBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted the respondent Shardaben Rakeshbhai Ramanbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient and unreliable evidence. The court determined that the panchnama (official record) was defective as the witnesses were all police officers rather than independent citizens, and critical evidence like laboratory testing reports for the seized liquid were not produced, making it impossible to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-May-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 626/2026
The court acquitted the respondent Shardaben Rakeshbhai Ramanbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient and unreliable evidence. The court determined that the panchnama (official record) was defective as the witnesses were all police officers rather than independent citizens, and critical evidence like laboratory testing reports for the seized liquid were not produced, making it impossible to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts