THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SURAJBEN RAJUBHAI FATESINGBHAI VASAVA — 621/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030009552026

Filing Number

621/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

621/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199021251416

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURAJBEN RAJUBHAI FATESINGBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted the respondent Surajben Rajubhai Fatesingbhai Vasava of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient credible evidence. The court held that the panchanama (witness statement) lacked proper authentication, police witnesses had conflicting accounts, and lab testing reports on seized samples were not produced, thereby failing to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 01-May-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 621/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the respondent Surajben Rajubhai Fatesingbhai Vasava of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for illegal liquor sale, finding insufficient credible evidence. The court held that the panchanama (witness statement) lacked proper authentication, police witnesses had conflicting accounts, and lab testing reports on seized samples were not produced, thereby failing to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case