THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GEETABEN VINODBHAI SAMSINGBHAI VASAVA — 619/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030009532026

Filing Number

619/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

619/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199021251411

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GEETABEN VINODBHAI SAMSINGBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The State of Gujarat failed to establish sufficient evidence against the accused Geetaben Vinodbhai Samsingbhai Vasava regarding charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA). The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including unreliable panchnama (seizure record), uncorroborated witness testimony from police officials, and absence of proper laboratory testing reports, rendering the case insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and discharged from all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 619/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The State of Gujarat failed to establish sufficient evidence against the accused Geetaben Vinodbhai Samsingbhai Vasava regarding charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA). The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including unreliable panchnama (seizure record), uncorroborated witness testimony from police officials, and absence of proper laboratory testing reports, rendering the case insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and discharged from all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case