THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUSHILABEN GOMANBHAI VELJIBHAI VASAVA — 618/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030009522026

Filing Number

618/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

618/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199021251410

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHILABEN GOMANBHAI VELJIBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case 618/2026 Summary The State of Gujarat charged Sushilaben Gomanbhai Veljibhai Vasava under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 2017, but the court acquitted her under IPC Section 271. The prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence—the panchnama (seizure document) lacked credible witness corroboration, the testing laboratory report was absent, and police officers rather than independent witnesses signed the panchnama, rendering it unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 01-May-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 618/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 618/2026 Summary The State of Gujarat charged Sushilaben Gomanbhai Veljibhai Vasava under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 2017, but the court acquitted her under IPC Section 271. The prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence—the panchnama (seizure document) lacked credible witness corroboration, the testing laboratory report was absent, and police officers rather than independent witnesses signed the panchnama, rendering it unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case