THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs REVABEN MANABHAI MOHANBHAI VASAVA — 617/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030009512026
Filing Number
617/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
617/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021251409
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.REVABEN MANABHAI MOHANBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 617/2026 The court acquitted Revaben Manabhai Mohanbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged offense of possessing foreign liquor for sale. The court determined that the investigating officer's panchnama (official record) lacked proper substantiation, the five witnesses were primarily police officials rather than independent observers, and critical evidence such as laboratory testing reports on the seized liquid were absent or inconclusive, rendering the prosecution's case legally deficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-May-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 617/2026
Summary of Case 617/2026 The court acquitted Revaben Manabhai Mohanbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged offense of possessing foreign liquor for sale. The court determined that the investigating officer's panchnama (official record) lacked proper substantiation, the five witnesses were primarily police officials rather than independent observers, and critical evidence such as laboratory testing reports on the seized liquid were absent or inconclusive, rendering the prosecution's case legally deficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts