THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHANIBEN MAGANBHAI MANJIBHAI VASAVA — 616/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030009502026
Filing Number
616/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
616/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021251405
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHANIBEN MAGANBHAI MANJIBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 616/2026: The State of Gujarat v. Shaniben Maganbhai Manjibhai Vasava The court acquitted the respondent Shaniben of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA), finding insufficient evidence to establish guilt. The prosecution's case relied on weak witness statements from police officers who lacked proper knowledge of the seized sample and failed to provide credible corroborating evidence, making it unsafe to convict based on such testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 616/2026
Summary of Case 616/2026: The State of Gujarat v. Shaniben Maganbhai Manjibhai Vasava The court acquitted the respondent Shaniben of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA), finding insufficient evidence to establish guilt. The prosecution's case relied on weak witness statements from police officers who lacked proper knowledge of the seized sample and failed to provide credible corroborating evidence, making it unsafe to convict based on such testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts