THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VESTIBEN MAHESHBHAI SARADHBHAI VASAVA — 615/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030009492026
Filing Number
615/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
615/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021251404
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VESTIBEN MAHESHBHAI SARADHBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted respondent Vestiben Maheshbhai Saradhbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illicit liquor distribution, finding insufficient evidence and credibility issues with the panchnama (seizure report) and witness statements. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case, as the five panchas (witnesses) were all police officers lacking independence, and critical evidence regarding the seized samples lacked proper documentation and testing reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 615/2026
The court acquitted respondent Vestiben Maheshbhai Saradhbhai Vasava of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illicit liquor distribution, finding insufficient evidence and credibility issues with the panchnama (seizure report) and witness statements. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case, as the five panchas (witnesses) were all police officers lacking independence, and critical evidence regarding the seized samples lacked proper documentation and testing reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts