THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs USHABEN SATISHBHAI RAMANBHAI VASAVA — 455/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH030007042026
Filing Number
455/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
455/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR
Judge
7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199021251204
Police Station
ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.USHABEN SATISHBHAI RAMANBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 455/2026 - The State of Gujarat v. Ushaben Satishbhai Ramanbhai Vasava The Gujarat High Court acquitted the respondent Ushaben of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding the prosecution's case fatally flawed. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish reliable evidence, noting that the panchanama (official record) was prepared by police officers rather than independent witnesses, making the seized contraband's authenticity unverifiable. Consequently, the court found insufficient grounds to sustain conviction and discharged the accused under CrPC Section 271. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 455/2026
Summary of Case 455/2026 - The State of Gujarat v. Ushaben Satishbhai Ramanbhai Vasava The Gujarat High Court acquitted the respondent Ushaben of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for alleged illegal liquor sale, finding the prosecution's case fatally flawed. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish reliable evidence, noting that the panchanama (official record) was prepared by police officers rather than independent witnesses, making the seized contraband's authenticity unverifiable. Consequently, the court found insufficient grounds to sustain conviction and discharged the accused under CrPC Section 271. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts