THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VINABEN ALPESHBHAI DALPATBHAI VASAVA — 454/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH030007032026

Filing Number

454/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

454/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, ANKLESVAR

Judge

7-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199021251203

Police Station

ANKLESHWAR G.I.D.C. POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINABEN ALPESHBHAI DALPATBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case 454/2026 Summary: State of Gujarat v. Vinaben Alpeshbhai Dalpatbhai Vasava The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the alleged offense of possessing or selling illicit liquor, as the panchas (witnesses) who conducted the search were police officers rather than independent citizens, undermining the credibility of the seizure and investigation procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 454/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 454/2026 Summary: State of Gujarat v. Vinaben Alpeshbhai Dalpatbhai Vasava The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the alleged offense of possessing or selling illicit liquor, as the panchas (witnesses) who conducted the search were police officers rather than independent citizens, undermining the credibility of the seizure and investigation procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case